The Prague Post - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

EUR -
AED 4.177115
AFN 81.881407
ALL 99.252011
AMD 444.59148
ANG 2.049629
AOA 1037.159602
ARS 1294.14051
AUD 1.780172
AWG 2.047025
AZN 1.937816
BAM 1.956825
BBD 2.294803
BDT 138.092365
BGN 1.957857
BHD 0.428625
BIF 3332.101328
BMD 1.137236
BND 1.492134
BOB 7.854392
BRL 6.605299
BSD 1.136596
BTN 97.022843
BWP 15.66621
BYN 3.71968
BYR 22289.824581
BZD 2.282996
CAD 1.574122
CDF 3271.828234
CHF 0.930817
CLF 0.028662
CLP 1099.88957
CNY 8.306268
CNH 8.306019
COP 4901.486936
CRC 571.199327
CUC 1.137236
CUP 30.136753
CVE 110.77121
CZK 25.063093
DJF 202.11002
DKK 7.466603
DOP 68.807192
DZD 150.758867
EGP 58.143353
ERN 17.058539
ETB 151.279275
FJD 2.59711
FKP 0.856519
GBP 0.857288
GEL 3.116471
GGP 0.856519
GHS 17.695835
GIP 0.856519
GMD 81.31675
GNF 9843.350125
GTQ 8.754588
GYD 238.429138
HKD 8.827817
HNL 29.46444
HRK 7.519522
HTG 148.317723
HUF 408.38716
IDR 19177.096068
ILS 4.189521
IMP 0.856519
INR 97.094367
IQD 1489.779092
IRR 47906.064711
ISK 145.100373
JEP 0.856519
JMD 179.644139
JOD 0.806646
JPY 161.682017
KES 147.276378
KGS 99.205077
KHR 4566.00273
KMF 492.996098
KPW 1023.486197
KRW 1613.044532
KWD 0.348711
KYD 0.947196
KZT 594.971784
LAK 24598.413953
LBP 101896.34134
LKR 339.937138
LRD 227.418803
LSL 21.444738
LTL 3.357963
LVL 0.687903
LYD 6.221113
MAD 10.547908
MDL 19.662304
MGA 5177.713287
MKD 61.514233
MMK 2387.750039
MNT 4034.978004
MOP 9.086962
MRU 44.847502
MUR 51.278399
MVR 17.517685
MWK 1974.241998
MXN 22.428272
MYR 5.012372
MZN 72.675107
NAD 21.444738
NGN 1824.926761
NIO 41.821916
NOK 11.919455
NPR 155.236349
NZD 1.916394
OMR 0.437833
PAB 1.136596
PEN 4.279463
PGK 4.700463
PHP 64.495498
PKR 319.112616
PLN 4.278742
PYG 9097.767521
QAR 4.140226
RON 4.978937
RSD 117.291464
RUB 93.451578
RWF 1609.188866
SAR 4.267179
SBD 9.516785
SCR 16.196165
SDG 682.914367
SEK 10.955779
SGD 1.490626
SHP 0.893689
SLE 25.900592
SLL 23847.250746
SOS 649.934509
SRD 42.248737
STD 23538.488054
SVC 9.945212
SYP 14785.985057
SZL 21.403201
THB 37.92345
TJS 12.206811
TMT 3.980326
TND 3.398104
TOP 2.663525
TRY 43.355779
TTD 7.712041
TWD 36.987505
TZS 3056.325739
UAH 47.101683
UGX 4166.329832
USD 1.137236
UYU 47.664978
UZS 14768.739292
VES 91.955341
VND 29420.293975
VUV 138.058823
WST 3.166177
XAF 656.312471
XAG 0.034867
XAU 0.000342
XCD 3.073437
XDR 0.816192
XOF 653.911048
XPF 119.331742
YER 278.907529
ZAR 21.425938
ZMK 10236.492294
ZMW 32.36396
ZWL 366.189511
  • BCC

    0.7800

    93.47

    +0.83%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    21.96

    +0.18%

  • SCS

    0.0500

    9.76

    +0.51%

  • GSK

    0.5600

    35.93

    +1.56%

  • NGG

    0.6300

    72.11

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.4

    +1.29%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    21.82

    +0.18%

  • RIO

    1.0100

    58.17

    +1.74%

  • BCE

    0.4200

    22.04

    +1.91%

  • AZN

    0.5400

    67.59

    +0.8%

  • VOD

    0.1400

    9.31

    +1.5%

  • RBGPF

    63.5900

    63.59

    +100%

  • RELX

    1.0000

    52.2

    +1.92%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1400

    9.36

    -1.5%

  • BP

    0.6600

    28.32

    +2.33%

  • BTI

    0.5400

    42.37

    +1.27%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

N.Kratochvil--TPP