The Prague Post - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

EUR -
AED 4.172469
AFN 82.254285
ALL 99.443091
AMD 442.669245
ANG 2.03356
AOA 1042.821867
ARS 1220.188126
AUD 1.80657
AWG 2.044748
AZN 1.935661
BAM 1.955664
BBD 2.288841
BDT 137.74043
BGN 1.961167
BHD 0.42777
BIF 3370.065862
BMD 1.135971
BND 1.496896
BOB 7.833456
BRL 6.659749
BSD 1.133621
BTN 97.596219
BWP 15.810902
BYN 3.709842
BYR 22265.033118
BZD 2.277042
CAD 1.575536
CDF 3265.353315
CHF 0.927096
CLF 0.029165
CLP 1119.192243
CNY 8.283619
CNH 8.27647
COP 4910.258856
CRC 581.659589
CUC 1.135971
CUP 30.103234
CVE 110.25734
CZK 25.124845
DJF 201.665989
DKK 7.469696
DOP 70.015136
DZD 149.546094
EGP 58.259952
ERN 17.039566
ETB 147.302266
FJD 2.589451
FKP 0.877892
GBP 0.869044
GEL 3.135724
GGP 0.877892
GHS 17.570779
GIP 0.877892
GMD 81.226307
GNF 9813.318212
GTQ 8.743393
GYD 237.163523
HKD 8.810422
HNL 29.369959
HRK 7.534333
HTG 148.329695
HUF 409.938323
IDR 19081.076584
ILS 4.222235
IMP 0.877892
INR 97.663012
IQD 1484.996829
IRR 47824.382762
ISK 145.295033
JEP 0.877892
JMD 179.687516
JOD 0.805522
JPY 163.035006
KES 146.799801
KGS 99.341107
KHR 4541.684463
KMF 499.263598
KPW 1022.440932
KRW 1614.4251
KWD 0.348107
KYD 0.944734
KZT 585.8193
LAK 24559.293723
LBP 101571.343247
LKR 338.136508
LRD 226.724248
LSL 21.868981
LTL 3.354228
LVL 0.687138
LYD 6.299562
MAD 10.546067
MDL 20.093604
MGA 5113.644725
MKD 61.530725
MMK 2385.165785
MNT 3990.8206
MOP 9.055971
MRU 44.687895
MUR 49.87338
MVR 17.498202
MWK 1965.663434
MXN 23.067966
MYR 5.023837
MZN 72.60034
NAD 21.868981
NGN 1814.225757
NIO 41.717102
NOK 12.117749
NPR 156.154151
NZD 1.950333
OMR 0.437393
PAB 1.133621
PEN 4.231206
PGK 4.684675
PHP 64.754939
PKR 317.835518
PLN 4.289579
PYG 9069.369898
QAR 4.133413
RON 4.979761
RSD 117.211857
RUB 96.243313
RWF 1633.886484
SAR 4.263339
SBD 9.490317
SCR 16.273869
SDG 682.154808
SEK 11.102759
SGD 1.499032
SHP 0.892695
SLE 25.877842
SLL 23820.746739
SOS 647.85499
SRD 42.083228
STD 23512.307787
SVC 9.919311
SYP 14770.008163
SZL 21.857481
THB 38.057346
TJS 12.316644
TMT 3.975899
TND 3.411763
TOP 2.660562
TRY 43.085154
TTD 7.708464
TWD 36.779567
TZS 3038.088926
UAH 46.92884
UGX 4165.710584
USD 1.135971
UYU 49.176583
UZS 14700.978637
VES 87.603875
VND 29259.775028
VUV 142.891608
WST 3.235249
XAF 655.91143
XAG 0.035181
XAU 0.000351
XCD 3.070019
XDR 0.815743
XOF 655.91143
XPF 119.331742
YER 278.657784
ZAR 21.729241
ZMK 10225.106937
ZMW 31.995777
ZWL 365.782223
  • JRI

    0.1450

    11.91

    +1.22%

  • BCC

    0.9800

    95.66

    +1.02%

  • BCE

    0.3800

    21.36

    +1.78%

  • RBGPF

    62.0100

    62.01

    +100%

  • NGG

    2.4700

    68.06

    +3.63%

  • CMSD

    -0.3000

    21.9

    -1.37%

  • RIO

    1.9900

    56.86

    +3.5%

  • CMSC

    -0.3500

    21.8

    -1.61%

  • SCS

    -0.0300

    10.18

    -0.29%

  • BTI

    1.0200

    41.57

    +2.45%

  • RELX

    0.1000

    49.12

    +0.2%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0100

    9.12

    -0.11%

  • VOD

    0.2800

    8.73

    +3.21%

  • GSK

    1.0400

    34.64

    +3%

  • AZN

    1.4200

    66.29

    +2.14%

  • BP

    0.3600

    26.59

    +1.35%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI - AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

D.Dvorak--TPP